An
American visitor to Montreal recently asked me "What is the 'record' for
judicial review in Canada?" I chuckled, said "It depends" and directed
her to paragraph 48 of Dunsmuir.
In Saskatchewan (Energy and Resources) v Areva Resources Canada Inc, 2013 SKCA 79 (which I have already blogged about here),
the Ministry did not offer any interpretation of the provision at the
time it made its decision. After a judicial review application had been commenced, the Ministry duly filed a supporting affidavit explaining its position.
Showing posts with label Saskatchewan (Energy and Resources) v Areva Resources Canada Inc. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Saskatchewan (Energy and Resources) v Areva Resources Canada Inc. Show all posts
Wednesday, 14 August 2013
Tuesday, 13 August 2013
The Thin Line between Law and Discretion
A recurring issue in the law of judicial review is the distinction between law and discretion. Where this matters the most is in substantive review: should a similar standard of reasonableness be applied to questions of law and exercises of discretion?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)