An
American visitor to Montreal recently asked me "What is the 'record' for
judicial review in Canada?" I chuckled, said "It depends" and directed
her to paragraph 48 of Dunsmuir.
In Saskatchewan (Energy and Resources) v Areva Resources Canada Inc, 2013 SKCA 79 (which I have already blogged about here),
the Ministry did not offer any interpretation of the provision at the
time it made its decision. After a judicial review application had been commenced, the Ministry duly filed a supporting affidavit explaining its position.
Showing posts with label 2013 SKCA 79. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2013 SKCA 79. Show all posts
Wednesday, 14 August 2013
Tuesday, 13 August 2013
The Thin Line between Law and Discretion
A recurring issue in the law of judicial review is the distinction between law and discretion. Where this matters the most is in substantive review: should a similar standard of reasonableness be applied to questions of law and exercises of discretion?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)